Share

Viewed 2084 times

JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N.

    Rabbit Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sat, 07 May 2005 02:46:00 GMT (5/7/2005) edit


    United States Texas

    Post 1143 of 2903
    Since 1/8/2004
    It is quite possible, then, that the Governing Body were unaware that the Watch Tower Society had been registered as an NGO, and even if some of them did know, it is highly probable that they were not aware of all the terms and implications of such a membership.

     Sure...sure..well one thing we DO know is what the GB would have done to the poor misled WT representative who 'mistakenly' made a deal with the Devil's summer home at the UN, right ?

     And they would have made a public execution out of it, too!     BUT, they did not...why ?

     Because of how 'high' it went. The GB knew all right.

     

    Rabbit
    sf Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sat, 07 May 2005 02:52:00 GMT (5/7/2005) edit




    Post 4812 of 8056
    Since 3/16/2001

    The weblink you posted originally is not working now.  Is it correct? [ http://www.wtdefended.co.sr/ ]

    sKally
    Kenneson Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sat, 07 May 2005 03:52:00 GMT (5/7/2005) edit

    United States Florida

    Post 4290 of 5871
    Since 1/8/2002

    Sf,

    It is correct.  But I don't know why it's not working right now.
    Klaus Vollmer Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sat, 07 May 2005 08:17:00 GMT (5/7/2005) edit


    Luxembourg

    Post 282 of 323
    Since 10/9/2001

    I think this guy has retired his site in recognition that he does not reach something he wants to reach.

    perhaps he even got an email from the society to withdraw it.

    the more someone is fighting for the society the more he accuses it the spiritual fornication.

    They knew it all the years and resigned year by year the membership. so they never were not informed about the sense of an ngo. They used it to reach targets by political strategies.

    like more than 70 years ago when they wrote a letter to the German Reichskanzler, Mr. Adolf Hitler, where they accused the Jews and agreed in the same targets as the German government did have.

    Where is the bucket I want to vomit. I cant eat as much as I need vomitting.

    Hypocrites and haeretics those in the ivory tower - they are like the pharesees of Jesus days, reaping where they have not sawn.

    They loose the power

     
    avengers Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sat, 07 May 2005 08:49:00 GMT (5/7/2005) edit


    Netherlands

    Post 2325 of 3045
    Since 10/4/2001

    ((((((SF)))))

    The site was working yesterday. Guess they took it off line. No wonder.

    BTW. The WT, GB, knew exactly what they were doing. They didn't count on the information age to catch up with them.

    The time is over when they could just write and say anything they want.

    Now they're being held liable for every word.

    (I don't believe in the bible anymore [thank the WT for that]), but according to their own words nothing shall be kept

    secret, everything hidden shall be uncovered.

    alt  Andy
    Kenneson Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sat, 07 May 2005 10:55:00 GMT (5/7/2005) edit

    United States Florida

    Post 4291 of 5871
    Since 1/8/2002

    Here's the latest development.  When you click on to the link the following message appears:

    "The free member account you are looking for is no longer available here.

    "We had a number of phishing sites open accounts on our free servers.  This resulted in complaints from other members of the internet community, and as a result we were forced to remove all free accounts from our servers and discontinue offering free accounts in the future.

    "We are sorry we had to remove the free accounts, but unfortunately it had to be done in order to protect our members using our paid services.

    "We will continue to offer our affordable paid service.s

    "Thank you for your time and understanding."

     
    cyberguy Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sun, 08 May 2005 02:03:00 GMT (5/8/2005) edit


    United States Florida

    Post 464 of 711
    Since 8/5/2001

    Hey Kenneson,

    That link you have isn't working for me! Do you have another link?

     

    Thanks.
    DannyBear Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sun, 08 May 2005 03:03:00 GMT (5/8/2005) edit




    Post 2249 of 2267
    Since 2/14/2001

    After more than 24yrs out of cult, it still amazes me that I can visualize or actually feel the intensity of former strong beliefs.

    The exuses for misconduct by prominent jw leaders are on the tip of every jw's tounge. 'Jehovah uses them', 'its not the man, but the position thats important', 'Jehovah will fix things', 'all of us are weak and imperfect', 'where else can we go?' the list of exuses is endless.

    Maybe other mainstream religious adherents experience this zeal.....but I somehow believe it (fervor) belongs mainly to the cult follower. They may not even consider themselves radical zealots, but by adhereing to the tenants of Jehovah's Witnesses they are by default, radical.

    The simple fact is there is NO exuse for the wtbs socities conduct as respects its association with the UN. The volumes of words written about 'the beast' seal this assertion as fact.

    Yet the little r & f lambs will jump at the opportunity to defend 'thier shepherds'.......in this case the sheep are truly having the wool pulled and sown over the eyes.

    Danny

     
    Kenneson Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sun, 08 May 2005 03:41:00 GMT (5/8/2005) edit

    United States Florida

    Post 4292 of 5871
    Since 1/8/2002

    Cyber,

    If you will look at my post above, I'm sorry to say that the link has been removed.  I wish it would have stayed on longer or could be posted somewhere else, so that  we could have more  completely analyzed it.  However, if there are any lurkers reading this (and maybe even old timers), you will want to take a look at the classic thread on the United Nations, NGO's and WTBS on this forum.  The discussion transpired at the very outset when this first became known.  It's a good refresher and goes on for some 23 pages.

    http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/11/10732/1.ashx
    Kaput Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sun, 08 May 2005 16:04:00 GMT (5/8/2005) edit




    Post 9 of 913
    Since 9/29/2004

    Probably just another sentinel. Special missions for special zeroes.

    I took the red pill and I'm glad I did.
    DannyHaszard Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Sun, 08 May 2005 18:20:00 GMT (5/8/2005) edit


    United States Maine

    Post 9 of 5120
    Since 5/6/2005

     

    THANK YOU SO MUCH

    We come a long way.....

    1996 Quincy Massachusetts (above)

    I exited Jan 92 after a brutal assault,that was pre-internet period,before Ray Franz's COC

    All ALONE i thought the only apostate's in the whole world were David Reed and myself
    Kenneson Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Mon, 09 May 2005 02:39:00 GMT (5/9/2005) edit

    United States Florida

    Post 4297 of 5871
    Since 1/8/2002

    Those wishing to read more on the UN/Watchtower debacle can do so by looking at the links provided by Lady Lee at  http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/32/76847/1.ashx
    Mr. Kim Re: JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N. posted Mon, 09 May 2005 22:28:00 GMT (5/9/2005) edit


    United States Washington

    Post 722 of 1153
    Since 2/26/2003

    JW's United Defend W.T.'s Relationship With U.N.......?

    The "truth" has set many free.  Too bad most R&F cannot think for themselves.  

     

    The brothers in charge KNEW what was going on.  To say otherwise is to show how stupid and detached from reality you really are.

    Nuff said
      Close

      Confirm ...