Share

Viewed 13665 times

Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation

    DannyHaszard Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:23:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Maine

    Post 1508 of 5120
    Since 5/6/2005
     
     
    Jehovah's loses comp case
    Church may be forced to pay millions
    A 46-year-old woman who devoted her life to the Jehovah's Witnesses said she was forced to move from their Brooklyn compound after she was seriously injured while serving the church.
     
    But a judge's ruling this week that she is entitled to worker's compensation payments could end up costing the church millions of dollars.
     
    Brenda Upton and her husband, Michael, took a vow of poverty and moved to the Witnesses' Brooklyn headquarters in 1998 to work as chiropractors for other church members.
    She injured her spine while running to catch a bus at an upstate church compound later that year.
     
    "They take wonderful care of you up to a point, and then you're on your own," Upton said. "That's why we wound up going to court."
    She said she suffered debilitating nerve injuries that have left her barely able to carry a laundry basket. The church took care of her medical care until 2001, when she and her husband were asked to leave and were given a $79,000 stipend.
     
    But Workers' Compensation Law Judge Stephen Goldstein ruled Wednesday that Upton is entitled to $400 a week in workers' compensation payments.
     
    "I'm finding they were not religious volunteers," Goldstein said. "They were engaged, particularly Dr. Brenda Upton, in a number of work-like activities."
     
    The Witnesses vowed to appeal the ruling, saying Upton and the other 5,800 Witnesses who live and work in the church's New York operations are volunteers, not employees.
     
    [ edit from Danny Haszard-we need to keep up vigil ]
     
    But if the decision stands, the Witnesses - and other religious organizations - could potentially face millions of dollars in workers' compensation insurance premiums and payments, said church lawyer John Miller.
    "It'll pretty much put religious orders out of business," Miller said. "It would certainly impact whether we would ever want to continue operations" in New York.
     
    The church owns about 40 properties in downtown Brooklyn and has plans to build a huge new structure on a vacant lot.
     
    Miller would not speculate how the workers' compensation case would affect those plans.
    "We don't have a spiritual conflict," said Upton, who has moved with her husband to Washington State.
     
    "Our problem all along has been medical-legal. We are still active Jehovah's Witnesses."

    ------------
     
    news@edit.nydailynews.com  write the paper
     
     
     
    DannyHaszard Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:26:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Maine

    Post 1509 of 5120
    Since 5/6/2005

    Top ranked news worldwide and will hang biggie

    Jehovah's loses comp case

    New York Daily News, NY - 1 hour ago

    A 46-year-old woman who devoted her life to the Jehovah's Witnesses said she was forced to move from their Brooklyn compound after she was seriously injured ..

    [original news link] 

     
    DannyHaszard Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:27:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Maine

    Post 1510 of 5120
    Since 5/6/2005
    Jehovah's loses comp case

    Church may be forced to pay millions

    A 46-year-old woman who devoted her life to the Jehovah's Witnesses said she was forced to move from their Brooklyn compound after she was seriously injured while serving the church.

    But a judge's ruling this week that she is entitled to worker's compensation payments could end up costing the church millions of dollars.

    Brenda Upton and her husband, Michael, took a vow of poverty and moved to the Witnesses' Brooklyn headquarters in 1998 to work as chiropractors for other church members.

    She injured her spine while running to catch a bus at an upstate church compound later that year.

    "They take wonderful care of you up to a point, and then you're on your own," Upton said. "That's why we wound up going to court."

    She said she suffered debilitating nerve injuries that have left her barely able to carry a laundry basket. The church took care of her medical care until 2001, when she and her husband were asked to leave and were given a $79,000 stipend.

    But Workers' Compensation Law Judge Stephen Goldstein ruled Wednesday that Upton is entitled to $400 a week in workers' compensation payments.

    "I'm finding they were not religious volunteers," Goldstein said. "They were engaged, particularly Dr. Brenda Upton, in a number of work-like activities."

    The Witnesses vowed to appeal the ruling, saying Upton and the other 5,800 Witnesses who live and work in the church's New York operations are volunteers, not employees.

    But if the decision stands, the Witnesses - and other religious organizations - could potentially face millions of dollars in workers' compensation insurance premiums and payments, said church lawyer John Miller.

    "It'll pretty much put religious orders out of business," Miller said. "It would certainly impact whether we would ever want to continue operations" in New York.

    The church owns about 40 properties in downtown Brooklyn and has plans to build a huge new structure on a vacant lot.

    Miller would not speculate how the workers' compensation case would affect those plans.

    "We don't have a spiritual conflict," said Upton, who has moved with her husband to Washington State.

    "Our problem all along has been medical-legal. We are still active Jehovah's Witnesses."



    Originally published on January 6, 2006
    DannyHaszard Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:35:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Maine

    Post 1511 of 5120
    Since 5/6/2005
    Jehovah's loses comp case
    Church may be forced to pay millions
    A 46-year-old woman who devoted her life to the Jehovah's Witnesses said she was forced to move from their Brooklyn compound after she was seriously injured while serving the church.
     
    But a judge's ruling this week that she is entitled to worker's compensation payments could end up costing the church millions of dollars.
     
    Brenda Upton and her husband, Michael, took a vow of poverty and moved to the Witnesses' Brooklyn headquarters in 1998 to work as chiropractors for other church members.
    She injured her spine while running to catch a bus at an upstate church compound later that year.
     
    "They take wonderful care of you up to a point, and then you're on your own," Upton said. "That's why we wound up going to court."
    She said she suffered debilitating nerve injuries that have left her barely able to carry a laundry basket. The church took care of her medical care until 2001, when she and her husband were asked to leave and were given a $79,000 stipend.
     
    But Workers' Compensation Law Judge Stephen Goldstein ruled Wednesday that Upton is entitled to $400 a week in workers' compensation payments.
     
    "I'm finding they were not religious volunteers," Goldstein said. "They were engaged, particularly Dr. Brenda Upton, in a number of work-like activities."
     
    The Witnesses vowed to appeal the ruling, saying Upton and the other 5,800 Witnesses who live and work in the church's New York operations are volunteers, not employees.
     
    But if the decision stands, the Witnesses - and other religious organizations - could potentially face millions of dollars in workers' compensation insurance premiums and payments, said church lawyer John Miller.
    "It'll pretty much put religious orders out of business," Miller said. "It would certainly impact whether we would ever want to continue operations" in New York.
     
    The church owns about 40 properties in downtown Brooklyn and has plans to build a huge new structure on a vacant lot.
     
    Miller would not speculate how the workers' compensation case would affect those plans.
    "We don't have a spiritual conflict," said Upton, who has moved with her husband to Washington State.
     
    "Our problem all along has been medical-legal. We are still active Jehovah's Witnesses."

    ------------
     
    news@edit.nydailynews.com  write the paper
    Dansk Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:36:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United Kingdom England, Greater Manchester

    Post 3058 of 6166
    Since 2/16/2003
    But if the decision stands, the Witnesses - and other religious organizations - could potentially face millions of dollars in workers' compensation insurance premiums and payments, said church lawyer John Miller.

    "It'll pretty much put religious orders out of business," Miller said. "It would certainly impact whether we would ever want to continue operations" in New York.

    Whilst I'm not looking for religious organisations per se to be put out of business, I'd certainly rejoice at Crooklyn biting the dust!

    Well done, Danny!

    Ian
    Gill Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:37:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United Kingdom England, North Yorkshire

    Post 1752 of 6243
    Since 11/4/2004
    I should imagine, that people in New York would be only too glad if the WTBTS moved its operations out of the city.  It looks as if they're in the process of doing that anyway, maybe they'll use this as an excuse for moving out and down sizing.
    greendawn Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:38:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United Kingdom England

    Post 3111 of 12660
    Since 4/9/2004
    Oh well for them $400 per week is peanuts given the fact that they are playing with billions, that will teach them something about not being so tight and uncharitable.
    tijkmo Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:58:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United Kingdom Scotland, Glasgow

    Post 2396 of 4730
    Since 3/17/2005
    has plans to build a huge new structure on a vacant lot.
    anybody know anything about this?
    West70 Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:10:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit




    Post 144 of 256
    Since 8/20/2005
    You can bet your sweet ... that this lawsuit is the reason behind the recent Bethel "layoffs".



    This is "Jimmy Swaggart" and the "Donation Arrangement" all over again.



    Legal already knew they were going to lose this one at trial level, and the "layoffs" are either a result of Legal's anticipating losing the Appeal, OR, are done as a "protest" hoping to affect the Appeal.



    Without more info, I'm not sure whether "advertising" the "layoffs" harm or help the WatchTower. Tread cautiously for a few days.
    carla Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:31:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit




    Post 1111 of 5826
    Since 4/23/2005
    They still consider themselves active jw's, what cong would accept them after suing their god, organization?
    Frannie Banannie Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:39:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Texas

    Post 4426 of 6672
    Since 8/8/2003
    "Our problem all along has been medical-legal. We are still active Jehovah's Witnesses."

    But not for long when they experience the reaction of their peers.

    Good JOB!!!

    Frannie
    luna2 Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:45:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States

    Post 1942 of 4880
    Since 4/22/2005

    I'm wondering that too, carla.  Given that JWs weren't encouraged to go to the police or the law even when their children were sexually abused, I'm a bit confused as to how any dub could sue the WTS and still beconsidered "in good standing"? 

    Not that I'm not pleased the the WTS is going to have to fork out some money and perhaps reveiw their policy of drop kicking Bethelites out of New York when they have an illness or injury that doesn't allow them to slave for the org any more, but I am curious as to how these folks are really viewed by other dubs as well as the org itself.  I suppose it would look bad in court if they df'd them, huh?  LOL
    carla Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:47:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit




    Post 1112 of 5826
    Since 4/23/2005
    Also, why a $79,000.00 stipend? Have they ever given any injured Bethel worker any such stipend? didn't a guy lose his hand long ago at Bethel and all he got was sent home?
    LittleToe "It'll pretty much Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:51:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United Kingdom Scotland, Western Isles (Na H-Eileanan An Lar)

    Post 12901 of 17187
    Since 9/12/2001
    "It'll pretty much put religious orders out of business," Miller said. "It would certainly impact whether we would ever want to continue operations" in New York.

    So they're a "religious order", now?  How will they be discerned from Christendom, or even the wider "Babylon the Great", if they keep on assuming "worldly" titles?

    Oh, that's right - they've been riding the back of the beast (United Nations) already, haven't they - they ARE part of BtG!

     
    DannyHaszard Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:06:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Maine

    Post 1512 of 5120
    Since 5/6/2005
    {I am placing this here to show how every post we make chips away at the Watchtower racket.}
     
     
    Dealing with the small stuff

    InfoWorld - 5 minutes ago

    ... to handle a relatively benign and minor consequence of diversity in the workplace has started to turn into a referendum on whether the Jehovah's Witnesses are a cult...
     
    January 06, 2006

    Dealing with the small stuff

    I'm doing something I've never done before: I'm pulling the plug on a discussion thread. Through a combination of "slippery slope" and hitting the wrong button, a discussion about how to handle a relatively benign and minor consequence of diversity in the workplace has started to turn into a referendum on whether the Jehovah's Witnesses are a cult.



    Not only don't I plan to take a position on this issue, I'd advise you to do the same, at least during work hours. It isn't that cults are good things. It's that there's no hard, sharp line that divides religions or cultural groups from cults. To give you an example, one of the harsher posts used the Jehovah's Witness practice of "shunning" those who leave the faith as evidence of its cultishness. Which brings up this question: Whether your grandfather's refusal to speak with your uncle for the past 40 years, after your uncle left the Lutheran church to become a Catholic, is an example of shunning, and if so whether that makes Lutheranism a cult.



    Not to mention the Amish, for whom shunning is a recognized form of punishment.



    And on, and on, and on. In your role as an IT leader, that doesn't matter. Whether someone is a member of the disreputable cult of Lutheranism, described in horrifying detail by Garrison Keilor every week on A Prairie Home Companion (it's a code: The acronym, PHC, also stands for "putrid and horrible cult"), really doesn't matter to you, or it shouldn't.



    Here's the lesson I've drawn from the amazing response to this posting. I've read, and given, lots of advice to IT managers and executives over the past ten years. Almost none of it covers something very real that working managers face every day in companies all over America: Seemingly trivial issues arising from seemingly trivial differences among employees that can grow until they have a remarkable impact on organizational performance.



    I don't know exactly where you should go to find authoritative advice on how to handle employee birthday celebrations. I do know they can start as spontaneous outpourings of affection - a way of saying "we're glad you were born" - to obligatory traditions, and from there to unintended sleights if someone is left our, or to accidentally offensive displays of disrespect for another's religion, as in the case we've been discussing.



    And this is just one of dozens of equally trivial issues that can blow up in your face. Most managers would rather avoid dealing with them; many deal with them through the probably worse solution of adding yet another policy to the overburdened Policy Manual.



    One way or another, these are issues you have to deal with, generally with some delicacy. If you're thinking you don't (and please - feel free to post your opinion on this), here's my response in advance: You do, because it can affect team performance, and you are responsible for that.



    - Bob

    Posted by Bob Lewis on January 6, 2006 04:39 AM

    Comments
    Post a comment
    ICBehindtheCurtain Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:16:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Kansas

    Post 240 of 628
    Since 8/6/2005

    DannyH YOU DA MAN!!!!!!!!!   THIS IS GREAT NEWS!!!!!!  This would seem to be the real reason they are laying off all those workers, they don't want to be sued by anyone slipping or hurting themselves on their premises.  It could also open a big can of worms, I personally know of quite a few bethelites back in the 80's that were exposed to asbestos and other chemicals while working in bethel that got seriously and sometimes fatally ill, they were just let go, but this could potentially be the straw that broke the camels WTS's back! 

    If the Court's decision stands, they can be sued up the WAZOO, by all those poor brainwashed bethelites that gave years of their lives and health to the Borg!  YESSSSSSSSS, I can only hope!

    IC (of the Sue the WTS till it's bankrupt class)
    david_10 Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:18:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Texas

    Post 211 of 270
    Since 12/20/2001

    Hooray!!    That's great news, and the odds are good that this will hold up on appeal.   The odds are real good.   Maybe Eduardo could weigh in on this.    Where are you, Eduardo?

    However, as to "millions" being paid out, I don't see that happening.  Not even close.   To collect even One million, the Uptons would have to get $400 a week for nearly 50 years.   It's very unlikely that either of them will live that long.   From the WTBS standpoint, it's really pretty paltry----------------------they should just go ahead and pay it and be done with it.   

    David
    Satanus Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:47:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit




    Post 10425 of 17518
    Since 8/31/2001

    I wonder if any of the dismissed bethelites will become disgruntled and try for severence, or breach of contract, or something along that line.

    S
    Elsewhere Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:53:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit


    United States Texas

    Post 13377 of 19457
    Since 2/8/2002

    Is this for real??? 

    Please tell me this isn't a gag post!

     
    West70 Re: Real 'BIG' news WTS sued biggie worker compensation posted Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:03:00 GMT (1/6/2006) edit




    Post 145 of 256
    Since 8/20/2005
    Danny:



    You are correct. This news article is "genuine" BIG NEWS, and hopefully this thread may be accessed via Google for many months/years to come.



    Therefore, while you have time, why not revise the name of this thread in accordance with its level of importance, such as:



    "NYJudge Rules Some Bethelites Entitled To Workers Comp Coverage"



    Another suggestion: Don't clutter your own threads; especially ones with genuine BIG NEWS.



    Another suggestion: Don't HIJACK your own BIG NEWS threads with irrelevent, off-topic stuff that coud be posted elsewhere.



    Thanks for your well meaning efforts.



      Close

      Confirm ...