Viewed 1895 times
Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
|
|
Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:32:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|---|---|
|
Post 8 of 1020 Since 8/19/2012 |
How much do you want to bet, that in the next year or two, the Governing Body will get "new light" and change their name to Jehovah's Christian Witnesses"? |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:41:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 718 of 1229 Since 6/2/2011 |
I'll take the "No," side and bet $100. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:04:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 1731 of 1860 Since 9/26/2009 |
Actually,I don't believe they will,since we were told not to say that out in service. There is supposedly an "apostate" group who goes by Jehovah's Christian Witnesses. At least,that is what I was told. |
Athanasius
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:28:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 886 of 903 Since 9/24/2001 |
You are correct, EmptyInside. There is a schismatic sect of Jehovah's Witnesses that goes by the name Jehovah's Christian Witnesses. I think there is a small group of them in the Seattle area. By the way shortly after the Rutherford coup in 1917, a group of Bible Students broke away from the Watchtower. They were called the Stand Fast movement and they were mostly located in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S. and British Columbia in Canada. So it's possible that the JWs from that part of the country are more independent in their thinking. Maybe there are some ex-JWs from Washington State that have more information on the JCWs. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:30:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 965 of 1007 Since 10/16/2011 |
Ray Franz was fond of the term and you know what happened to him. If he said it, wrote it, or liked it, it is no longer acceptable. Congregations that had signs that said Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Christian Witnesses were told they must remove Christian from the signs. The WT$ is correct they are NOT Christian. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:37:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 10 of 1020 Since 8/19/2012 |
Thanks, all of you for your comments. I thought since they have signed off on some official correspondence as "Jehovah's Christance Witnesses", they were letting "us" get used to that idea. |
yadda yadda 2
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:06:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() Post 1228 of 1727 Since 4/22/2008 |
Nothwithstanding all that, the point is it would make a lot of sense for them to do it. Their current name makes them sound like a quasi-Jewish cult and not Christian at all (there is a good argument that they are in fact just that). Even my mother who has been a devoted Witless for 43 years and never read anything apostate thinks they should change their name to this. But alas, the almighty creator of the universe was trumped by a tiny, obscure ex-JW group getting rights to it first. Oh dear, how sad, never mind. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 10:07:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() WisconsinPost 701 of 703 Since 1/17/2005 |
Their letterhead has on it, "Christian Congregation of Jehovan's Witnesses". This way they affiliate them selves with the word Christian but keep the name different than the other group to avoid any legal entanglements. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:28:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 720 of 1229 Since 6/2/2011 |
OK, but I'm still interested in a bet? Do we have anyone on the other side willing to make a wager? |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:16:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 568 of 611 Since 3/31/2011 |
|
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:50:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 1395 of 2186 Since 5/11/2010 |
n the meantime, this imposter GB has not had "new light" in 20 years, Utter bollocks, ..as per usual. Faulty premise, faulty "logic", = bonkers conclusions.
|
jgnat
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:56:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() AlbertaPost 17788 of 21023 Since 7/4/2002 |
"planned JW kill event" huh? |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:13:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 884 of 3217 Since 4/10/2008 |
Possibly something might change from the WTS. starting in 2014 and further on, as they try and distance themselves from 100 years of failed prophecies. New Light can come in many variations, such as changing the name of the Watchtower and Awake magazines, they did this once before you'll remember. There is a underlining marketing strategy operating within the WTS. publishing house, whether one is intellectual aware of this or not.
|
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:37:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
|
Post 4 of 651 Since 8/22/2012 |
Since Christ's promise is applicable to so very few within the JW congregation, I'm kinda thinking the name Jehovah"ists" would be most appropriate. They can practice Jehovah"ism". The Aid to Bible Understanding tells everyone who actually reads it that the term "Jehovah" was a name that was made up by a Roman Catholic monk in 1270 AD. That would make it man-made. It would only be fitting that a man-made organization would leverage the use of a man-made name. Oh wait... that would make it harder to deceive the unwashed masses who have some familiarity with the New Testament's promises to Christians... nevermind. The insertion of the word "Christian" would clearly serve the corporation's goal of acquiring more intangible assets... I mean... "believers." Having more "believers" has the potential to lead to higher revenues.... unless folks stop believing in the product. Lois, as an outsider who has only gotten a 1 year internet driven education of what this organization has done to people's lives, my stomach churns just thinking about what may be in the works to maintain current and obtain more intangible assets - I mean, "believers." Sorry. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:54:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() British ColumbiaPost 24385 of 25587 Since 10/11/2001 |
They will release "new light" before the planned JW kill event,
The Cuckoo is out of his Clock Again.. ........................... |
kurtbethel
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:57:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 3643 of 4725 Since 5/20/2007 |
Jehovah's Christian Witnesses, sure. You could put a sign on Anthony Morris III's desk that says "Respected Bible Scholar" but that does not make it so.
|
blondie
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:24:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() Post 34901 of 36352 Since 5/28/2001 |
The WTS once used this phrase frequently. They started using it frequently in the mid 60's but by 1984 with one last mention in the WT and a couple in 1986 publications, the phrase was dropped. The WTS even directed congregations not to put that phrase on the KH sign. *** km 4/79 p. 4 Announcements ***Is it appropriate to have a Kingdom Hall sign saying: “Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Christian Witnesses”? So there will be uniformity, the Society encourages all to make their signs read: “Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witnesses.” They now have a corporation called "Christian Witnesses of Jehovah" which may circumvent the problem of another group having it as a "trademark." *** w03 12/15 p. 21 par. 9 Prove Yourself Ready for Jehovah’s Day ***The outer garments mentioned here refer to what identifies us as Christian Witnesses of Jehovah. This includes our work as Kingdom proclaimers and our Christian conduct. If we slide into sleeplike inactivity, we may be stripped of our Christian identity. |
Quandry
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:26:00 GMT
(8/26/2012)
|
![]() TexasPost 3994 of 4082 Since 5/17/2006 |
Welcome to the forum, Lois. I enjoyed your opening post. I don't know what their next "new light" will be, but I'm thinking it will be something again with the generations..........after all, no one can understand the "current light" on that one. |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:58:00 GMT
(8/27/2012)
|
|
Post 485 of 706 Since 2/5/2012 |
Agreed. Maybe a new greater scale fulfillment of the generation and Revelation. 1914 was correct we live in the spiritual paradise now, but soon Arm...
same bulls**t x2 ... |
|
|
Re: Jehovah's Christian Witnesses
posted Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:19:00 GMT
(8/29/2012)
|
|
Post 472 of 656 Since 5/2/2008 |
Is this the official name in the UK? THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF JEHOVAH’S CHRISTIAN WITNESSES See link with letterhead:
|


Home

California


Alberta

...OUTLAW



