Partakers of emblems in 2010, 2011 and 2012?


Viewed 3719 times

    Christiana posted Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:09:00 GMT(6/2/2012)

    Post 2 of 5
    Joined 6/1/2012

    M Poztate posted Sat, 02 Jun 2012 01:44:00 GMT(6/2/2012)

    Post 2413 of 2485
    Joined 10/6/2003

    Try using crome or firefox

    admirmitch posted Sat, 02 Jun 2012 03:32:00 GMT(6/2/2012)

    Post 6 of 40
    Joined 1/19/2012

    I don't have 2011 or 2012 but I suspect it will go up again.

    2010: 11,202

    2009: 10,857

    clarity posted Sat, 02 Jun 2012 03:57:00 GMT(6/2/2012)

    Post 1591 of 4081
    Joined 8/9/2010

    christiana .... welcome aboard ....keep trying


    F Gayle posted Sat, 02 Jun 2012 04:52:00 GMT(6/2/2012)

    Post 3486 of 4481
    Joined 11/17/2006

    2011- 11,824

    Christiana posted Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:38:00 GMT(6/4/2012)

    Post 4 of 5
    Joined 6/1/2012

    JWOP posted Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:04:00 GMT(6/6/2012)

    Post 43 of 293
    Joined 4/17/2012

    In 2005 the sum of Memorial partakers world wide numbered 8,524. The following year, in 2006, they tallied an increase to 8,758 partakers. In 2007 the number went up again to 9,105. In 2008 the number rose to 9,986. In 2010, the number of partakers grew to 11,202. And recently, it was published that the number in 2011 rose again to the tune of 11,824 partakers (Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, 2006, p.31; 2007 p.31; 2008, p. 31;2009, p.31;Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, 2011, p.51; Yearbook of Jehovah's Witnesses, 2012, p.55 respectively), This is an increase of exactly 3,300 partakers over seven years! (and, haven't some of the elderly ones passed away during this time?). spite of the Watchtower Society publishing these ever-increasing numbers, they have declared that the number has been decreasing over the years! (The Watchtower, February 15, 2009, pp. 27-28, para.14)

    DesirousOfChange posted Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:01:00 GMT(6/6/2012)

    Post 1680 of 5222
    Joined 1/13/2011

    Plus I know of a couple who partake privately due to so much otracism/criticism when they were partaking publicly at the KH.

    There must be more.

    M flipper posted Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:47:00 GMT(6/6/2012)

    Post 14702 of 17731
    Joined 3/7/2007

    JWOP- Thanks for sharing those numbers of partakers the last 6 years or so. It truly shows this is a wacked out organization when they lie about the increasing numbers of partakers - yet at the same time the numbers partaking have increased by about 39 % over the last 6 years from 8,524 partakers to 11, 824 partakers. That's pretty weird and again- a telling sign that somethings seriously wrong and amiss with this organization. Peace out, Mr. Flipper

    M steve2 posted Wed, 06 Jun 2012 23:40:00 GMT(6/6/2012)

    Post 4797 of 8788
    Joined 10/31/2004

    These numbers are collectively embarrassing for the Watchtower. The numbers also inadvertently suggest that the Watcthower is not "massaging" the numbers in its annual report of their worldwide work, as some have claimed. If the Watchtower were adjusting the numbers to align with their teachings (e.g., that the number of anointed is decreasing), we would not see the consecuative yearly increases since 2005. Yet, at the same time, pressure must be on to "make sense" of the significant increase in the number of attendees who are taking the emblems.

    BroMac posted Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:15:00 GMT(6/7/2012)

    Post 254 of 718
    Joined 10/13/2011

    recently we had a Sub-CO's wife start partaking. she's in her 40's. her husband does not.

    M jwfacts posted Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:01:00 GMT(6/7/2012)

    Post 6583 of 8024
    Joined 6/25/2005

    M ThomasCovenant posted Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:13:00 GMT(6/7/2012)

    Post 759 of 887
    Joined 7/20/2005

    So what triggered the increase 2007 onwards?

    M wha happened? posted Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:56:00 GMT(6/7/2012)

    Post 8322 of 10423
    Joined 10/2/2004

    The openning of the door to new annointed. The door was originally closed in 1935 but since most if not all the GB were born after that date, it certainly stretches theircrdibility to lead that organization. So they changed the rules, with the resulting numbers jumping through the roof. Can't wait to see what happens this year

    M jwfacts posted Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:33:00 GMT(6/7/2012)

    Post 6585 of 8024
    Joined 6/25/2005

    It coincides with this 2007 Watchtower comment.

    "Thus it appears that we can not set a specific date for when the calling of Christians to the heavenly hope ends." Watchtower 2007 May 1 p.31

    JWOP posted Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:48:00 GMT(6/8/2012)

    Post 48 of 293
    Joined 4/17/2012

    What I love is their reasoning on this matter:

    "A number of factors -- including past religious beliefs or even mental or emotional imbalance -- might cause some to assume mistakenly that they have the Heavenly Calling. We thus have no way of knowing the exact number of anointed ones on Earth; nor do we need to know." (The Watchtower, August 15, 2011, p.22)

    wasblind posted Fri, 08 Jun 2012 02:06:00 GMT(6/8/2012)

    Post 5704 of 9381
    Joined 6/13/2010

    Don't bode to well for the Elders who approved these folk as baptismal candidates

    it shows they baptised people who didn't have a clear understandin' of the things taught

    Question: where was the spirit direction ?

    M wha happened? posted Fri, 08 Jun 2012 06:31:00 GMT(6/8/2012)

    Post 8329 of 10423
    Joined 10/2/2004

    well it wasn't the 1st time things backfired on them

    JWOP posted Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:15:00 GMT(6/9/2012)

    Post 49 of 293
    Joined 4/17/2012

    I agree, Wasblind. I mean, if they were truly indoctrinated to the point of being eligible for baptism, then how does this kind of thing slip through?

    And then to claim that others are mentally ill..... that's just so low.

    And then they finish it off with "We have no way of knowing the exact number...nor do we need to know"....



    M kurtbethel posted Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:21:00 GMT(6/10/2012)

    Post 3190 of 4591
    Joined 5/20/2007

    Because the teaching of the anointed partakers has no basis in reality, it puts a JW is in a hard spot if they are asked to explain why the number of partakers are increasing. As this clip shows, they are even willing to resort to outright fabrication if asked about this.


      Confirm ...