Viewed 1167 times
Lets Debate the Trinity
|
|
Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:51:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
|---|---|
|
Post 2553 of 2559 Since 8/11/2002 |
Come on everyone, let us reason on the Trinity Doctrine using the Bible! You know there has to be at least 3 big long Trinity threads on here per month... so I figured I'd go ahead and start one for November. The Bible says that there is only one true God who is God by Nature, the only God who deserves our worship and prayer. Jesus taught that His Father is God. However, on the other hand, the Scriptures repeatedly say (both explicitly and implicitly) that Jesus Christ is God by Nature (John 1:1; John 1:18; John 20:28; Colossians 2:9; Philippians 2:6; 2 Peter 1:1; Titus 2:13; John 10:30) as well as describing the Holy Spirit as having all of the same qualities and attributes as The Father and The Son. (Please, try to keep the name-calling or ad hominem personal attacks to a minimum if at all possible) |
AllTimeJeff
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:02:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
![]() Post 3628 of 3854 Since 11/9/2006 |
As an uninterested observer on the trinity, but an interested observer in different people's belief, I wish you the best in your discussion. With a broader knowledge of bible tradition now, I can see how the Trinity can be believed. JW's do lie about this, which is the only reason I ever give a passing glance at subjects like this. I don't believe in the bible, but respect your right to do so. Peace.... |
yesidid
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:53:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
|
Maldives Post 1246 of 1257 Since 12/11/2002 |
trinity...............again..............................yawn |
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:01:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
![]() Post 8992 of 9102 Since 5/10/2007 |
I will here assume that the Bible is an authority (which, to me, is a big stretch). I see scriptures like John 1:1 (which the Not Well Translated version tampered with) telling us that the Word was with God, and the Word is God. That tells me that God and the Word have to be the same Being. Another scripture tells us that Jesus, in his own words, and God, are one. You are going to find so many other scriptures like these (in fact, so many that the Filthful and Disgraceful Slavebugger had to put out a brochure to refute them all)--telling us that, in fact, the Trinity is a teaching that is in the Bible. However, if you do not take the Bible literally, one could conclude that Jesus was his own God, and merely teaching others to be their own Gods as well. If that's the case, of course Jesus and God would have been one and the same. And that would have been true of anyone that got to the point of fully independent thinking--once your thinking is fully integrated, you become your own God. |
mouthy
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:39:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
![]() OntarioPost 13374 of 13501 Since 11/22/2001 |
The Trinity is an unfathomable, and yet unmistakable doctrine in Scripture. As Jonathan Edwards noted, after studying the topic extensively, “I think [the doctrine of the Trinity] to be the highest and deepest of all Divine mysteries” (An Unpublished Treatise on the Trinity). Yet, though the fullness of the Trinity is far beyond human comprehension, it is unquestionably how God has revealed Himself in Scripture—as one God eternally existing in three Persons. This is not to suggest, of course, that the Bible presents three different gods (cf. Deut. 6:4). Rather, God is three Persons in one essence; the Divine essence subsists wholly and indivisibly, simultaneously and eternally, in the three members of the one Godhead—the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Scriptures are clear that these three Persons together are one and only one God (Deut. 6:4). John 10:30 and 33 explain that the Father and the Son are one. First Corinthians 3:16 shows that the Father and the Spirit are one. Romans 8:9 makes clear that the Son and the Spirit are one. And John 14:16, 18, and 23 demonstrate that the Father, Son, and Spirit are one. Yet, in exhibiting the unity between the members of the Trinity, the Word of God in no way denies the simultaneous existence and distinctiveness of each of the three Persons of the Godhead. In other words, the Bible makes it clear that God is one God (not three), but that the one God is a Trinity of Persons. In the Old Testament, the Bible implies the idea of the Trinity in several ways. The title Elohim (”God”), for instance, is a plural noun which can suggest multiplicity (cf. Gen. 1:26). This corresponds to the fact that the plural pronoun (”us”) is sometimes used of God (Gen. 1:26; Isa. 6:8). More directly, there are places in which God’s name is applied to more than one Person in the same text (Ps. 110:1; cf. Gen. 19:24). And there are also passages where all three divine Persons are seen at work (Is. 48:16; 61:1). The New Testament builds significantly on these truths, revealing them more explicitly. The baptismal formula of Matthew 28:19 designates all three Persons of the Trinity: “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.” In his apostolic benediction to the Corinthians, Paul underscored this same reality. He wrote, “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God [the Father], and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with you all” (2 Cor. 13:14). Other New Testament passages also spell out the glorious truth of the Triune God (Romans 15:16, 30; 2 Cor. 1:21–22; Eph. 2:18). In describing the Trinity, the New Testament clearly distinguishes three Persons who are all simultaneously active. They are not merely modes or manifestations of the same person (as Oneness theology incorrectly asserts) who sometimes acts as Father, sometimes as Son, and sometimes as Spirit. At Christ’s baptism, all three Persons were simultaneously active (Matt. 3:16–17), with the Son being baptized, the Spirit descending, and the Father speaking from Heaven. Jesus Himself prayed to the Father (cf. Matt. 6:9), taught that His will was distinct from His Father’s (Matt. 26:39), promised that He would ask the Father to send the Spirit (John 14:16), and asked the Father to glorify Him (John 17:5). These actions would not make sense unless the Father and the Son were two distinct Persons. Elsewhere in the New Testament, the Holy Spirit intercedes before the Father on behalf of believers (Rom. 8:26), as does the Son, who is our Advocate (1 John 2:1). Again, the distinctness of each Person is in view. Jesus is also given titles that are unique to YHWH (the formal name of God) in the Old Testament. The Old Testament title “redeemer” (Psalm 130:7; Hosea 13:14) is used of Jesus in the New Testament (Titus 2:13; Revelation 5:9). Jesus is called Immanuel—“God with us”—in Matthew 1. In Zechariah 12:10, it is YHWH who says, “They will look on me, the one they have pierced.” But the New Testament applies this to Jesus’ crucifixion (John 19:37; Revelation 1:7). If it is YHWH who is pierced and looked upon, and Jesus was the one pierced and looked upon, then Jesus is YHWH. Paul interprets Isaiah 45:22-23 as applying to Jesus in Philippians 2:10-11. Further, Jesus’ name is used alongside God’s in prayer “Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:3; Ephesians 1:2). This would be blasphemy if Christ were not deity. The name of Jesus appears with God's in Jesus' commanded to baptize “in the name [singular] of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 28:19; see also 2 Corinthians 13:14). The Bible is clear. There is only one God, yet He exists, and always has existed, as a Trinity of Persons—the Father, the Son, and the Spirit (cf. John 1:1, 2). To deny or misunderstand the Trinity is to deny or misunderstand the very nature of God Himself. Hope this helps, and God bless. -Daniel J. Angle Working4Christ Ministries. Proud to be a Slave of God. Knight of the Lord's Table, defending the Truth. oxxxx[]:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
|
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:40:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
|
Post 2 of 3 Since 10/29/2009 |
Mouthy: Hello and thank you for the post explaining the Holy Trinity. I am new to this site and am also a born again Christian who believes according to scripture that God is three persons working simultaneously with one another. How awesome. But, it seems to me that those who don't believe in the trinity would surmise in their own minds that there couldn't possibly have been non other than God who could atone for the sins of mankind. Thank you and God Bless. I will certainly refer to your eloquent and biblically factual explanation when speaking to others about the trinity.
|
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:54:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
|
Post 886 of 962 Since 6/25/2009 |
Following out of interest |
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:18:00 GMT
(11/7/2009)
|
|
Post 461 of 507 Since 6/17/2009 |
The Bishops who concocted this theory struggled mightily to make the young Jew, Jesus, the equal if not the better to the gods of the Greek and Roman world. As Professor Owen of Cambridge said 'if you get rid of all of the Greek philosophical vocabulary in Christian theology you cannot express God's threeness-in-oneness in anything approximating a coherent way. You simply can't do it. And historically its the case that whenever people have tried to purge Christianity of what we would call metaphysical language , philosophical language, it always ends up in Unitarianism.' The great tragedy is that they turned this good Jew into a monster god capable of doing the unthinkable. |
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:30:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
|
Post 2203 of 2301 Since 12/29/2007 |
|
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:16:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() Post 1084 of 1157 Since 1/8/2007 |
I too am following out of interest. Life is an interesting little puzzle isn't it? Is there a superior life-form that could be referred to as a God? Is this superior life-form a singular personality, or is it a triune god-head? Or is this superior life-form something completely different? Does he or she exist at all? Carry on team! I will stand by and keep reading.
The Oracle |
parakeet
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:37:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() Post 3244 of 3352 Since 5/11/2006 |
Not the trinity ...... AGAIN. As soon as I'm finished typing this, I'm going to bang my head against the wall.
|
mouthy
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:27:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() OntarioPost 13379 of 13501 Since 11/22/2001 |
Delivered >>>>Welcome to the board Good to have you join us . I was not the writer of that article on the Trinity,It is a young I found it interesting, & because I am lazy!!!! I just copied & pasted it http://exjw.weebly.com/ Grace/Mouthy/ Granny!!!! |
Wasanelder Once
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:38:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() Post 2086 of 2102 Since 6/23/2005 |
Have at it folks. For me its like trying to decide if the tooth fairy is a schitzophrenic. More power to ya. W.Once |
wobble
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:12:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() Post 1707 of 1786 Since 2/20/2008 |
I think god is a Quaternity, not just a trinity. He consists of The Father, The Son, The Holy Spirit and Mankind. I am sure that given time I can find enough proof from scripture for this, in the form of Quaternitan formulae, prophetic "types" and lots of times where four things are mentioned etc. etc. I think Trinitarians are one god short of a Godhead. Love Wobble |
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:17:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
|
Post 68 of 76 Since 9/24/2009 |
Is understanding of the Trinity doctrine essential for salvation? Jesus told the thief, impaled along side him, that he would be with him in paradise. Do you really think the thief understood whether or not Jesus was part of a Trinity? |
drew sagan
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:12:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() Post 4183 of 4210 Since 8/16/2005 |
People line up on different sides of this debate based upon assumptions. If you believe the Bible to be a unified, cohesive, and noncontradictory then you will take the position that the trinity is either 'right' or 'wrong'. If wrong, another system will be put forward as the correct one. Yet, if you throw out that assumption you are left with something more complicated (and realistic). A series of books that may not necessarily agree with each other. The idea of a single cohesive theory melts away, and you are left to realize that the Bible speaks less about modern theologial debates than we think it does. |
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:15:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
|
Post 462 of 507 Since 6/17/2009 |
No, he may have been of Jewish ancestry, but not a very observant or practicing Jew. The observation of history is that some of the Christian communities sought to coherer and form politicial and social power bases in order to survive. Those groups quickly turned to intolerance, violence and murder. Murder by the 100's of millions over the centuries. Some one quoted Voltaire recently, and I paraphrase 'absurd beliefs produce absurd actions'. The early Bishops conceived of a god who would harm people in the afterlife, what a gateway drug to humans seeking harm to others. They christened themselves the arm of god on earth and killed innocents by the millions. By any metric of ethics they make the sins of the Society, and those sins are valid, a speck in comparison to these so called Christians of the Trinitarian persuasion who are like jihadists. They took the good name of a young Jew and tried to ruin it. Thank God for the brave men and women who stood up against it over the centuries. |
parakeet
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:38:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() Post 3248 of 3352 Since 5/11/2006 |
wobble: I think god is a Quaternity, not just a trinity. Why stop at four? Why not include the animals, the planets, the sun, moon, and stars? Maybe "God" is a gazillion-ity. Do you know what you have when you believe the divine exists everywhere? Buddhism.
|
|
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:49:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
|
Post 463 of 507 Since 6/17/2009 |
Parakeet You may now sip your morning coffee in peace..... |
JosephMalik
|
Re: Lets Debate the Trinity
posted Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:38:00 GMT
(11/8/2009)
|
![]() North CarolinaPost 1468 of 1484 Since 5/2/2002 |
Come on everyone, let us reason on the Trinity Doctrine using the Bible! Undisfellowshipped, I did this some time ago and put some thoughts together here: http://home.earthlink.net/~jmalik/beytrin.htm Joseph
|



Home



Ontario






that really is the Oooopsie about this theory, as they developed this idea of hypostatic union along with omnipresence any observer quickly realizes...everything is god!
