Viewed 991 times
Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
|
|
Re: Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:08:00 GMT
(9/1/2007)
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post 1320 of 2663 Since 11/12/2004 |
http://www.jwfiles.com/2034.htm
Nevada- ![]() |
|
OnTheWayOut
|
Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:37:00 GMT
(9/1/2007)
|
|
![]() IllinoisPost 3913 of 11619 Since 9/8/2006 |
There was a study article in early 2006 that also did the reminder of the 120 years of time after The WTS is seeing so much decline that it is highly likely they will see a need to set a date. If they started soon enough, most of the current GB would be dead by then, not caring about the I like how Arthur said they could come up with something like "the final gleaning." I also think they will lose more than the total growth if they do that. They will shrink to a couple |
|
|
|
Re: Re: Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:44:00 GMT
(9/1/2007)
|
|
![]() Post 1 of 1 Since 9/1/2007 |
>They'll do what they always do. Deny, deny, deny. Yes and also, blame the sheep, blame the sheep, blame the sheep. It would be such a trip to live long enough to see the borg disolve. But alas, they've got enough bread to last the rest of our lifetimes and more. Whatcha' bet that they'll dust off the 1957 "Sputnik Generation" doctrine proposal and publish it? |
|
greendawn
|
Re: Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:51:00 GMT
(9/1/2007)
|
|
![]() EnglandPost 11339 of 12660 Since 4/9/2004 |
Certainly not, the JWs have been playing with dates for almost 130 years now and they have been very imaginative with producing new ones throughout that time, their end of times enthusiasm never fades. And if we see them as part of the adventist movement then their date setting goes back 200 years to the early 19th century.
The whole issue is too profitable for them to abandon, like all large corporations they loathe dropping what brings in good profit. |
|
|
|
Re: Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:57:00 GMT
(9/1/2007)
|
|
|
Post 8116 of 8836 Since 7/3/2002 |
I submit that whatever date the WTBS came up with, or modified for whatever reason, would be accepted by the mass of their constituency, because that's what the constituency wanted to believe to begin with. I don't buy into the ideas of corporate profits, or individual glorification. People, as a mass (sociological group), do what they do because that's what they want to do. In that perspective, the WTBS is not a director...it's a facilitator. As are all religions, and political bodies. People want to believe that they are immortal, or in some way immune to mortality (going to heaven, achieveing Nirvana, etc.)---and yet mortality is the one and only demonstrable aspect of existence (for all living things). |
|
yknot
|
Re: Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:53:00 GMT
(9/1/2007)
|
|
![]() Syrian Arab Republic Post 15 of 7956 Since 8/24/2007 |
Well it has been circulating in our area since 1995. If nothing happens the tower will not fall, they are already semi preparing for this situation. The whole 1914 (aside from the Rev book) is being less and less mentioned. Up until last year it appeared that the legal department would eventually take over but with the May QFR and the Kool-Aid WT it seems that a deal has been struck between the departments. Yep they all get a win, Service gets to limit production, lay-off bethelites,and close and sale properties(saving $$$), Writing gets to isolate and futher control the "sheep", and of course Legal gets to keep protraying JWs as mainstream. So if the GB/ Writing dept decide to press the 2034-2035 issue then it will be limited to "publishers" only and not the general public. And the average R&F Publisher can easily be replaced with new converts. The only good that will come of this is the lifting of the blood ban, expect that when there are only JWs who were baptized 1985 and after. Y |
|
|
|
Re: Is 2034 the ultimate Watchtower date?
posted Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:11:00 GMT
(9/2/2007)
|
|
![]() Post 950 of 10685 Since 5/10/2007 |
I think they could buy another 40 years or more by declaring that it was 587 BC after all that Jerusalem was destroyed, and use the correct number (365 1/4) days per year instead of 360. After that, they are going to be up Sxxx Creek without a paddle.
|



Home







Illinois

England

