Share

Viewed 1631 times

Is Fading a DF Offense?

    besty Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:25:00 GMT (4/10/2007) edit


    United States California

    Post 13 of 3914
    Since 3/3/2005

    Wife Sweet Pea and I are just starting the 2nd phase of our fade, which as we are already inactive and at 50% meeting attendance, means stopping going altogether.

    Supposing the elders decide they want to make a shepherding call - which we naturally decline - could they announce us as 'no longer known as JW's' for declining the call, not being at meetings and being inactive?

    What if we did take the shepherding call and told the elders we just weren't coming back, with no specific reasons given? They would be bound to ask if we still believed the FDS doctrine, which we could lie about use theocratic warfare strategy and say we were just a bit depressed, with money worries, struggling with the routine etc and would probably be back soon.

    Thoughts?

    sir82 Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:29:00 GMT (4/10/2007) edit


    Mongolia

    Post 956 of 6246
    Since 5/17/2005

    They shouldn't make any announcement just because you are inactive or decline a shepherding call.

    Just continue to decline their shepherding efforts - tell them you're "depressed" or "ill" or "too busy" or whatever, and you'll contact them when you want help. Be firm.

    After a while they should just leave you alone.

    undercover Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:33:00 GMT (4/10/2007) edit


    Morocco

    Post 4458 of 13624
    Since 9/25/2002

    Fading, in and of itself, is not a DFing offense.

    If you were to express your doubts or thoughts in a way that could be construed as "apostacy", whether to elders or other JWs, and the elders are a hardnosed bunch, they could potentially DF you for apostacy, if they wished to pursue the matter and attempted to force you to commit one way or the other.

    There are some here who can tell you horror stories about how they just were not allowed to quietly leave while others of us have had virtually no contact with elders after dropping off attendance at meetings and quitting service.

    Most here will advise not meeting with them at all.  Avoid them, avoid their questions.  They will give up in time, because most elders aren't industrious enough to keep bothering with it.

    Crumpet Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:35:00 GMT (4/10/2007) edit


    United Kingdom

    Post 5250 of 7259
    Since 10/21/2004

    So long as you do not say under any circumstances you dont believe any of it anymore as that would be DAing yourself. I believe if you say you dont wish to attend anymore they can call that DAing and announce it to, because I believe that this might have happened to me first time round only I was only 16 and didnt understand the fine print, but there were some confusing stories afterwards which i never got to the bottom of.

    Tread carefully. Tell them nothing.

    And I am thrilled to bits that you and your wife and your kiddies can go on the rest of your journey together - so much better than going it alone!

    blondie Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:37:00 GMT (4/10/2007) edit


    United States

    Post 22433 of 34147
    Since 5/28/2001

    Ditto, what sir82 said.  You can't be df'd for just declining a shepherding call.  I would just screen my calls and not talk to them at all and not answer the door when they just drop by.  I suppose if you still go to some meetings they might ask...but just avoid the "backroom." 

    BTW, missing meetings is not a df'ing offense either.

    Develop a form of deafness.  If they ask a question you don't want to answer and can't avoid by leaving, just change the subject to something like the weather and then leave.

    Blondie (fader--attends no meetings or conventions/assemblies or funerals/weddings)

    bluebell Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:40:00 GMT (4/10/2007) edit


    United Kingdom England

    Post 101 of 532
    Since 3/13/2007
    No its not a df offense nor is not talking to them - keep avoiding them
    Carmel Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:30:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States Oregon

    Post 4624 of 5133
    Since 6/2/2000
    Carmel Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:30:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States Oregon

    Post 4625 of 5133
    Since 6/2/2000
    Carmel Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:34:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States Oregon

    Post 4626 of 5133
    Since 6/2/2000
    Don't lie! Theocratic warfare is lowering yourself to their level. c
    sass_my_frass Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:54:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    Australia Australian Capital Territory

    Post 2167 of 3739
    Since 4/1/2005

    Hey well done!  Use your instincts; you know your elders and what their reactions would be.  Any hardliners?  If you have a real bloodhound in there he'll find a way to get you out if you give him a chance.  Otherwise you should be just fine - that's the point of a fade!

    How are things going with any JW family? 

    How about JW friends?  Are you doing okay, letting them go? 

    Umm... be careful who you trust!  A successful fade requires a smokescreen. 

    Gill Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:55:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United Kingdom England, North Yorkshire

    Post 4621 of 6259
    Since 11/4/2004

    Avoid!  Avoid!  Avoid!

    Don't worry!  They'll 'forget' about you sooner or later! 

    penny2 Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:17:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    Australia

    Post 499 of 1606
    Since 2/9/2006

    No but don't ever let them catch you with:

    • A xmas decoration on your door
    • A xmas tree in the window
    • Easter eggs in your shopping trolley

    You may be branded an apostate and regarded as having disassociated yourself by your actions.  That's why some move away after they have faded so they are not known by the local elders.

    It's crazy!

    OnTheWayOut Re: Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:48:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States Illinois

    Post 2377 of 15650
    Since 9/8/2006

    I concur with Undercover, Crumpet, and Sir82. 

    Fading is not a judicial matter.  Depression and stress and missing meetings is a sign of spiritual weakness

    to them.  Doubt is "officially" to be worked with, and the doubter is to be helped. 

    Unofficially, you can't ever say, "I am never going back" as that is disassociating yourself, the same as them

    disfellowshipping you.  You can't participate in holidays (openly). 

    No advice is always the answer.  Some elder bodies go hunting for faders, some leave them alone, and some

    try to save them from the fade.  I assume the worst and prepare for that. 

    OnTheWayOut Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:55:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States Illinois

    Post 2378 of 15650
    Since 9/8/2006

    Oh, if your elders are the fader hunter types, they could use a shepherding call to

    get you out.  All they have to do is ask a few questions, twist their understanding of

    the answers you provide- then 2 elders heard you say it.  The 2 ask to form a committee

    by adding a 3rd elder, the 2 tell him what they understood you to say, you refuse to

    meet with them, and they DF you.

    If you do meet with them, you have to give the right answers.  At the judicial meeting,

    you can't decide not to cooperate as that will give them grounds to say their understanding

    of what you have said is proof enough that you are apostate.  Better to avoid them at the

    shepherding level. 

    My body of elders has avoided me for 6 months now, I will have to switch to avoiding them

    when they finally get around to shepherding me.

    Fred E Hathaway Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:05:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit




    Post 581 of 604
    Since 2/20/2007
    So, without mincing words, the answer is YES, it's comparable to being DF'd. Fading is dying, just like leaves do in the fall. Faith without works is dead. Dead limbs are lopped off so as to make room for new growth, and as a warning to those that remain. Whether an announcement is made or not, the reality is the same. 
    penny2 Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:10:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    Australia

    Post 500 of 1606
    Since 2/9/2006
    Whether an announcement is made or not, the reality is the same. 

    Sorry Fred, to us fading is not dying.  It's starting to live.  And the reality is different.  If you are D/Fd or D/S yourself, your JW family won't speak to you anymore.  This has lifelong consequences.  If there is a family wedding for example, and one D/F person is going to be there, no JWs will attend.  If you've faded, you have no official status and family can continue to associate with you.

    Gill Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:15:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United Kingdom England, North Yorkshire

    Post 4630 of 6259
    Since 11/4/2004

    Fading is learning to breathe, think and live freely!

    Fading is the kindergarten to adult life and happiness.

    Fading is the gradual breaking of ties, bonds and shackles.

    Fading is what all Jehovah's Witness, deep inside wish they could do, but dare not ever admit it just incase anyone finds out.

    Fading is the stepping stone to freedom, happiness and acceptance.

    Fading has given us as a family, everything we always wished for from life.

    Fading is a gift you can give yourself and unwrap that gift at  your own pace.

    moshe Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:17:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States Indiana

    Post 1355 of 7776
    Since 1/18/2005

    Tell them you think you are coming down with a case of the shingles and don't want to get them sick, too. The elders will leave pronto.

    flipper Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:01:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States California

    Post 26 of 15765
    Since 3/7/2007
    Dear  Sweet Pea and her husband, I'm Flippers husband Mr. Flipper. Want to help you a little. The elders won't DF you for being inactive, or not going to meetings, but as in my case if you have relatives or friends who are witnesses, you have to be careful what you say to them, or they may act as spies and report what you do to the elders. I tried to fade and after 3 and a half years of inactivity the elders still came after me ,accusing me of living with my fiance before marriage. Due to my youngest daughter's and ex-wife's ( ex since 1998) intrusion into my personal life. It caused the elders to pursue someone (me) who had been uninvolved with the organization for 3 and a half years. A bit creepy and sobering, wouldn't you say? That they would view me as that an important entity to bother with is downright weird!!! The elders came after me when all I was trying to do was live a peaceful loving life with my new wife (quietly peacefully) . They kept bothering me even after 6 months of marriage. Finally I got tired of it and threatened them in writing with a lawsuit if they pursued it further and told them not to phone, stalk, or harass my wife or me any further at their own peril. That was 3 weeks ago and have'nt heard from them since ( knock loudly on wood everybody) . So to make a long message longer, sweet pea and her husband my advice is to be firm, don't tell them anything they could use against you and by all means, you need to assess if you have friends or family worth keeping in contact with in that organization, you still need to be discreet and careful as to what you say and to whom you say it to if they are JW's.
    flipper Re: Is Fading a DF Offense? posted Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:10:00 GMT (4/11/2007) edit


    United States California

    Post 27 of 15765
    Since 3/7/2007
     (continued) The old expression, " Anything you say can or will be used against you in a court of law" is true. Especially in a JW kangaroo court where the kangaroos hop around the truth and getthe hangman's noose out for you. I was raised a witness from the early 1960's and know what I'm saying. My dad and older brother are still elders in it. Just make sure your friends and family are worth keeping close to or ask yourself, would they jeopardize your sanity and prospects for a happy life???? Tread water carefully. Mrs. Flipper and I are very happy and we send our unconditional love. Sincerely, Mr. Flipper.
      Close

      Confirm ...