Viewed 1795 times
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
|
|
Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:05:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|---|---|
|
Post 2536 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
I am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to Laura Schlessinger. Snopes has the real scoop on it's origins. I'm sure it's been posted on JWN more than once in years past. Nonetheless, the content still makes a great point and is worth repeating, in my opinion.
Your devoted disciple and adoring fan, -SBC |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deaux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:09:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 6865 of 7431 Since 8/10/2011 |
It looks like there is SOMETHING good about the old law |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:27:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 2538 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
Which part, Nance? |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:32:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 6867 of 7431 Since 8/10/2011 |
Which part, Nance? The funny part? I mean it's a funny post. Very funny. |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:22:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 2544 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
Bumped for godless primates everywhere, with a Bill O'Reilly meme for good measure.
|
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:25:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 6876 of 7431 Since 8/10/2011 |
What I have not discovered is why it is OK for him to have egocentric thinking. Do you know Sweets? |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:26:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 6877 of 7431 Since 8/10/2011 |
Mr. Falcon will be so sorry he wasn't here today, don't you think? |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:27:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 2547 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
What I have not discovered is why it is OK for him to have egocentric thinking. Do you know Sweets? Why is it okay? Well, Nance, he's entitled to hold egocentric views just as we are. He can even share his on the tele. But then others are entitled to expose his baseless ideas or fallacious thinking and that also goes for JWN, too. In other words, we all have the right to be stupid. Whether or not we exercise that right is totally up to us. |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:47:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 1232 of 1543 Since 2/2/2011 |
Mr. Falcon will be so sorry he wasn't here today, don't you think? "For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst." (Matt. 18:20) |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:51:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 2549 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
Blessed be the Lord Falcon Almighty. Amen. |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:29:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 1238 of 1543 Since 2/2/2011 |
Praise Rang Everlasting. |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:39:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 2550 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
Well, this thread's not going anywhere. Screw it. Let's turn it into a self-abuse thread. I'll go first.
|
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:40:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 6886 of 7431 Since 8/10/2011 |
He knows what he's talking about! OMG it's too true. LOL |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:43:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 8945 of 11789 Since 6/25/2009 |
SELF ABUSE? Don't forget the kleenex! |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:54:00 GMT
(4/27/2012)
|
|
Post 2551 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
Cantleave: SELF ABUSE? Don't forget the kleenex!
|
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:40:00 GMT
(4/29/2012)
|
|
Post 4654 of 10312 Since 3/11/2011 |
Nice thread Sweetbaby... So are these ALL scripture N.drew? Or would some of these be dismissed by you as a 'joke' and tossed aside because they don't fit YOUR gods personality? Has your god informed you they are not scripture? |
jgnat
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:53:00 GMT
(4/29/2012)
|
![]() AlbertaPost 17104 of 21103 Since 7/4/2002 |
Are some scriptures more equal than others? http://www.ted.com/talks/a_j_jacobs_year_of_living_biblically.html |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:44:00 GMT
(4/30/2012)
|
|
Post 2554 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
StillThinking, those are some good questions for Nance. I hope she'll drop in and update us. jgnat, I'm a sucker for TED videos anyway but that was outstanding. Funny that he 'out-talked a JW.' Thanks for sharing! |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:04:00 GMT
(4/30/2012)
|
|
Post 6972 of 7431 Since 8/10/2011 |
So are these ALL scripture N.drew? No can do! I think it is satire, not philosophy. I cannot highjack the thread. My hands are tied. Ask someone else. |
|
|
Re: Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux
posted Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:09:00 GMT
(4/30/2012)
|
|
Post 2557 of 2874 Since 5/11/2010 |
Wow, NDrew! What high standards you've developed over the weekend for keeping threads on track! It's okay, really. This thread wasn't going anywhere and ST asked some good questions. Do you reject or accept those verses as being of divine origin?
|


Home


I thought that might help the thread. BTW, that was the very first term I ever disagreed with the WT on.

Alberta