Bookmark and Share

Viewed 495 times

The lying upper class??

    darthfader posted Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:37:00 GMT(2/27/2012)

    Post 1099 of 1422
    Joined 4/9/2009

    Interesting Article:

    http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/02/shame-on-the-rich.html?ref=hp

    The team's findings suggest that privilege promotes dishonesty. For example, upper-class subjects were more likely to cheat. After five apparently random rolls of a computerized die for a chance to win an online gift certificate, three times as many upper-class players reported totals higher than 12—even though, unbeknownst to them, the game was rigged so that 12 was the highest possible score.

    darthfader posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:04:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 1100 of 1422
    Joined 4/9/2009

    Wow... I was hoping to get some interesting insights on this article... I guess everyone agrees with it completely :)

    Cheers

    Tater-T posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:07:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 316 of 1434
    Joined 1/5/2012

    how else did you think they got there...

    Razziel posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:14:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 260 of 499
    Joined 5/4/2009

    I want to know... does privilege promote dishonesty or does dishonesty promote privilege? Which comes first, the chicken or the egg?

    TTWSYF posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:55:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 394 of 446
    Joined 1/5/2010

    I have read this before. There could be several reasons, but one could be that SOME educated people think that they're smarter than everyone else and that they can cover their tracks with spouses and others.

    dc

    TTWSYF posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:59:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 395 of 446
    Joined 1/5/2010

    incidently, ignorant people lie plenty too...ei-lying for the 'TRUTH'

    LV101 posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:56:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 779 of 1614
    Joined 5/25/2005

    I think this is a huge problem w/all of society -- the lying/conniving and have always had bad situations w/the lower end of the scale who are angry that someone has more. Some think upper class are so busy (are negligent w/their money) they won't notice (shopping orders, construction, maids, on and on). There's always someone w/their hand out wanting something from those that have more.

    People are liars ---

    darthfader posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:48:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 1101 of 1422
    Joined 4/9/2009

    Looks like this story keeps on giving and giving...

    http://news.yahoo.com/rich-people-unethical-224915381--abc-news.html

    At last, an explanation for Wall Street's disgrace, Bernard Madoff 's Ponzi scheme and other high-society crimes and misdemeanors: A new study published in the Proceedings of that National Academy of Sciences found that wealthier people were more apt to behave unethically than those who had less money.

    No Room For George posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:50:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 2184 of 1758
    Joined 4/25/2011

    Nice guys finish last.

    M james_woods posted Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:53:00 GMT(2/28/2012)

    Post 7899 of 12304
    Joined 10/26/2005

    May I just say that this is one of the most class-prejudicial topics that I have ever seen on JWN.

    It takes Obama-style class warfare to an entirely new level - people who are successful are automatically dishonest by this theory.

    Baloney.

    LV101 posted Thu, 01 Mar 2012 04:44:00 GMT(3/1/2012)

    Post 780 of 1614
    Joined 5/25/2005

    darthfinder --- this might be right about Wall St. and the rest of it, too. I'll check the link out. Guess that's why they have so-called country club prisons but thought most wealthy people went there because of tax evasion.

    Razziel posted Thu, 01 Mar 2012 05:23:00 GMT(3/1/2012)

    Post 266 of 499
    Joined 5/4/2009

    There's a sucker born every minute. There's also a liar/exaggerator/embellisher (whatever you want to call it) born every minute. The point of the research is to find if certain classes have a greater propensity for it.

    Do the results really suprise anyone? I won't defend the third test in the article, but I find the first two very in touch with reality. Intelligence, merit, hard work and ambition go a long way. But so does embellishment. Intelligence, merit, and hard work particularly is generally enough to ensure you make enough to pay the bills, but in most business environments that won't get you above middle management. If you want to make it to the top, it takes the ambition to aggressively pursue it, a little well-timed embellishment to accentuate your accomplishments, and a little luck. Hard work and intelligence alone won't get you there unless it falls in your lap, which is next to never.

    Especially in the test with the dice, I don't consider that lying (though technically it is). It doesn't matter how smart you are, you have to sell yourself and your abilities to get ahead. You have to portray yourself as a "winner". You need to have the ability to step in dogsh!t and come out smelling like roses.

      Close

      Confirm ...