Share

Viewed 461 times

Rutherfords burial site...

    TheApostleAK Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 05:58:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 183 of 380
    Since 3/22/2001
    To this day some have claimed that Rutherford was buried secretly at Beth-Sarim or Beth-Shan anyway, even though the Society has stated in print that Rutherford's remains were sent to Brooklyn for burial.

    I remember/read somewhere that he was buried at Staten Island, New York. Can anyone confirm that?

    Jang Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 06:31:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 407 of 539
    Since 8/16/2000
    There is a grave on Staten Island marked as Rutherfords.

    His casket was delivered to the gates othe cemetry by the undertaker. From there it was carried by 6 men from the GB to the grave. No one else was there so what happened between the gate and the burial we don't know ...

    There is/was what looked like a grave only a few feet from the crypt at Beth Sarim which had lain under a pile of rubbish which was finally removed.

    Some had hoped to have enough dollars to purchase Beth Sarim when old Dr Chan died so we could have the rights to dig up that site

    JanG
    CAIC Website: http://caic.org.au/zjws.htm
    Personal Webpage: http://uq.net.au/~zzjgroen/

    TheApostleAK Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 06:40:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 184 of 380
    Since 3/22/2001
    Anyone got any pics of the Staten Island site?
    Jang Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 06:58:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 410 of 539
    Since 8/16/2000
    Randy may have some ....

    I ran out of film the day I went there and didn't have a spare with me .... Murphy's law .....

    JanG
    CAIC Website: http://caic.org.au/zjws.htm
    Personal Webpage: http://uq.net.au/~zzjgroen/

    Farkel Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 06:58:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 656 of 10040
    Since 3/14/2001
    : Some had hoped to have enough dollars to purchase Beth Sarim when old Dr Chan died so we could have the rights to dig up that site

    Fat chance today, Jan! That mansion is worth at least 3.5 million dollars and I can prove it! Ed Gruss has got me motivated and on a mission about that place. Heck, it's nearly in my own back yard right now! I cruised by there just a week ago and noticed little kiddie trycycles on the patio. Da Judge would have never liked that!
    I will someday soon get the nerve to approach the attorney who owns it now and get a grand tour. I can do this. I'll pretend that I'm not a real Farkel or something.

    A friend of mine who I introduced to Professor Gruss and who just met him recently and spent three hours with him has my request to get the EXACT address of Beth Shan. I tried to find it based upon the info. in Gruss's book, but failed. Ed's on vacation right now, but patience will yield results. I will have much to say on the topics of Beth Sarim and Beth Shan when I'm finished with my little fact-finding mission.

    Farkel

    Prisca Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:07:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit


    Australia Victoria

    Post 915 of 7300
    Since 12/16/2000
    Farkel,

    I remember reading in another thread today that Beth Shan was located right next-door to Beth Sarim. Or is that incorrect?


    P.S. Glad you didn't leave us for good!

    VM44 Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:11:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 20 of 5256
    Since 7/1/2001
    Hi Farkel,

    Using Yahoo Maps, I got the following address with zip code for Beth Sarim:

    4440 Braeburn, San Diego, CA 92116-2126

    I still think it would be a good idea to post on the internet the complete floor plans
    for Beth-Sarim. Then we could see if it was REALLY designed for over a dozen
    people to live in.

    --VM44

    Jang Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:18:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 415 of 539
    Since 8/16/2000
    Prisca .... it is ALMOST next door .... on the other side of the canyon

    You can almost see where it is from Sarim's back yard

    JanG
    CAIC Website: http://caic.org.au/zjws.htm
    Personal Webpage: http://uq.net.au/~zzjgroen/

    VM44 Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:20:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 21 of 5256
    Since 7/1/2001
    Oops!

    Farkel wanted the exact address for Beth Shan! Not Beth Sarim!

    The exact address where Beth Shan used to be is probably in the book
    by Gruss and Chretien.

    If I recall correctly, Beth Shan was in Mission Valley, while Beth Sarim is
    located on a hilltop, or plateau, in the Kensington area of San Diego. The
    house does overlook Mission Valley, so one might have been able to
    see Beth Shan from Beth Sarim.

    --VM44

    Jang Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:22:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 416 of 539
    Since 8/16/2000
    Farkel:

    Fat chance today, Jan! That mansion is worth at least 3.5 million dollars and I can prove it!

    I know Farkel! That's why we all couldn't get the money together to buy it. Len Chretien was given first right to purchase it, but just coudln't afford it. He still hadn't recovered enough financially after the Witneses of Jehovah movie and being ripped off on that.

    We all communicated about that time but between us all we just couldn't make it ...... We are in the wrong business, all of us. We should have made up our own cult and made some money and then we would have had enough $$$$$$

    JanG
    CAIC Website: http://caic.org.au/zjws.htm
    Personal Webpage: http://uq.net.au/~zzjgroen/

    VM44 Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:26:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 22 of 5256
    Since 7/1/2001
    JanG,

    Len Chretien was ripped off? What happened?
    The movie has been around for quite some time, and still is available for
    purchase. I thought he would have at least broke even by now.


    --VM44

    Farkel Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:37:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 658 of 10040
    Since 3/14/2001
    Prisca,

    : I remember reading in another thread today that Beth Shan was located right next-door to Beth Sarim. Or is that incorrect?

    That is incorrect. In fact, if you saw the neighborhood, 4440 Braeburn is a gigantic mansion compared to the neighboring homes on that cul-de-sac and all the surrounding streets in the Kensington neighborhood of San Diego.

    I very recently crawled behind Beth Sarim and tried to see Beth Shan over the huge canyon that separates them. (Jan G was right: it IS across the canyon and about 1/2 mile away to the East.)

    So much development has happened in San Diego in recent years that If I COULD have seen Beth Shan I was too clueless to recognize it. That is why I need an exact address. I'm certain that it is in Alvarado Estates, but that is now a closed (and guarded) gated community. I recently went there and showed a picture (a colorized 1945 photo) of Beth Shan to the guard and she told me that no such house was in that community. The photo was 56 years old. No wonder she didn't recognize the home. I still think it is in that neighborhood.

    I will continue to plod on....I WILL find Beth Shan. Trust me! It's not as easy these days as when JanG and Ed Gruss made that trek, but I will find it and post pictures! I promise!

    Farkel

    Jang Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:38:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 419 of 539
    Since 8/16/2000
    As I said, one of the investors ripped all the others off actually, but since Lan had been the one who had got them into it, he was the one who lost out because he insisted in making sure they all got their money back at least.

    Don't forget that it is the film makers who get the best deal.

    What stunk is that the investor and the film maker were supposedly Christian brethren of Len and Marj ......


    JanG
    CAIC Website: http://caic.org.au/zjws.htm
    Personal Webpage: http://uq.net.au/~zzjgroen/

    VM44 Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 07:54:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 23 of 5256
    Since 7/1/2001
    Farkel,

    I don't think Beth-Shan exists anymore. Perhaps the bomb shelter under
    the "goat's barn" might still exist.

    Details when Beth-Shan was demolished might be in the book,
    "Jehovah's Witnesses: Their Monuments to False Prophecy"

    A good online article is at:
    http://www.premier1.net/~raines/bethshan.html

    --VM44

    nelly136 Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 10:20:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit

    United Kingdom England, Kent

    Post 180 of 2705
    Since 12/14/2000
    am curious about the name of Beth Shan,
    would any of russels interests in pyramids
    have had anything to do with the naming of it?
    http://www.varchive.org/ce/bethshan.htm

    nelly

    Fredhall Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 13:03:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 1089 of 3499
    Since 2/5/2001
    Do you guys need a pitch fork and a shovel to find his body? And when you guys get done looking for his body start searching for Moses body.
    Farkel Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:02:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 664 of 10040
    Since 3/14/2001
    VM44,

    : Details when Beth-Shan was demolished might be in the book,
    "Jehovah's Witnesses: Their Monuments to False Prophecy"

    I have the book and I've spoken with Ed Gruss the author. He last visited the site in 1997, I believe. He made no mention that it was demolished either in our phone conversations or in his book. When he gets back from vacation, I will get the exact address from him.

    Nelly136,

    Beth Shan means "House of Security" in Hebrew. This is a fitting name for a home with two bomb shelters, don't you think?

    Farkel

    larc Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 18:40:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit



    Post 1990 of 7844
    Since 12/2/2000
    Farkel,

    I too was under the impression from something I read that Beth Shan was torn down. Perhaps, I misread it, and it was only the outbuildings that were torn down. Also, I got the impression the two properties connected at least in the front of the property and the mansions themselves were sat back a good distance from the road and were seperated by a canyon.

    sf Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 21:49:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 309 of 8056
    Since 3/16/2001
    There has GOT to be tunnels then!
    sf Re: Rutherfords burial site... posted Sun, 08 Jul 2001 23:16:00 GMT (7/8/2001) edit




    Post 313 of 8056
    Since 3/16/2001
      Close

      Confirm ...