Attention: JW Leaks

Advertisement

Viewed 1170 times

    M DNCall posted Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:21:50 GMT(6/11/2013)

    Post 288 of 366
    Joined 4/8/2008

    Candace Conti's Respondent's Brief is now on file. Please do your thing!

    Anony Mous posted Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:58:56 GMT(6/11/2013)

    Post 927 of 1100
    Joined 3/11/2011

    Just reading one of their responses:

    As Watchtower Did Not Have a Special Relationship with the Plaintiff, It Did Not Have a Duty to Protect Plaintiff from Sexual Abuse by Kendrick, Nor to Warn the Plaintiff or Her Parents About Kendrick's Alleged Past Sexual Abuse of His Stepdaughter

    Disgusting.

    zound posted Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:48:36 GMT(6/11/2013)

    Post 110 of 656
    Joined 4/21/2013

    Where can I find this?

    Julia Orwell posted Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:53:50 GMT(6/11/2013)

    Post 932 of 3329
    Joined 1/26/2013

    And why isn't it plastered all over the world news? Is there a gag order or something?

    Oubliette posted Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:52:28 GMT(6/12/2013)

    Post 498 of 4336
    Joined 3/19/2013

    Julia Orwell: And why isn't it plastered all over the world news? Is there a gag order or something?

    As hard as it may seem to believe, (I know you're still kind of new to TTATT) the rest of the world is not really all that interested in JWs.

    Probably you know when the $28 million verdict was announced last summer, THAT was news.

    But this is just a trivial filing in an otherwise unremarkable trail. It may (or may not) be newsworthy again depending upon how it all shakes out at the end.

      Close

      Confirm ...