Bookmark and Share

Viewed 564 times

Noo Lite!

    hoser posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:20:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 277 of 1293
    Joined 1/26/2010

    There is noo lite on page 19 of the June 15/12 watchtower.

    From the perspective of Bible prophecy, then,

    the seventh world power did not become established

    in the late 1700’swhen Britain first began

    its rise to prominence. Rather, it attained that

    position at the beginning of the Lord’s day.

     This explanation updates the information discussed on

    page 57, paragraph 24, of the Daniel’s Prophecy book and depicted

    in the charts on pages 56 and 139.

    M DaCheech posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:37:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 5809 of 6647
    Joined 5/13/2004

    ooooooooooh, let me run to thank them for this fine food!

    Life couldn't continue without knowing all these useless details

    stillin posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:50:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 521 of 1318
    Joined 7/20/2008

    Hark! The ground shaketh!

    Alfred posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:02:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 871 of 953
    Joined 9/10/2010

    When the f**k is the "beginning of the Lord's day"? October 2, 1914? ... notice how they no longer get specific on dates...

    F AnnOMaly posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:43:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 2262 of 3984
    Joined 8/11/2003

    "Britain, a former part of the Roman Empire, began rising to prominence in the late 1700's." - p.19

    'Began rising to prominence in the late 1700s'???

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Empire

    First British Empire (1583-1783)

    Main article: English colonial empire

    In 1578, Queen Elizabeth I granted a patent to Humphrey Gilbert for discovery and overseas exploration. [17] That year, Gilbert sailed for the West Indies with the intention of engaging in piracy and establishing a colony in North America, but the expedition was aborted before it had crossed the Atlantic. [18] [19] In 1583 he embarked on a second attempt, on this occasion to the island of Newfoundland whose harbour he formally claimed for England, although no settlers were left behind. Gilbert did not survive the return journey to England, and was succeeded by his half-brother, Walter Raleigh, who was granted his own patent by Elizabeth in 1584. Later that year, Raleigh founded the colony of Roanoke on the coast of present-day North Carolina, but lack of supplies caused the colony to fail. [20]

    In 1603, King James VI of Scotland ascended to the English throne and in 1604 negotiated the Treaty of London, ending hostilities with Spain. Now at peace with its main rival, English attention shifted from preying on other nations' colonial infrastructure to the business of establishing its own overseas colonies. [21] The British Empire began to take shape during the early 17th century, with the English settlement of North America and the smaller islands of the Caribbean, and the establishment of private companies, most notably the English East India Company, to administer colonies and overseas trade. This period, until the loss of the Thirteen Colonies after the American War of Independence towards the end of the 18th century, has subsequently been referred to as the "First British Empire". [22]

    The early 17th century is, of course, the early 1600s.

    MeanMrMustard posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:23:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 483 of 947
    Joined 9/9/2010

    Oh my lord....

    M wha happened? posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:35:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 6439 of 10468
    Joined 10/2/2004

    History WT style. Just make it up as u go. Opps what was that? People can check facts easier? The Internet? Now people have access to information that proves we're making it up? Oh. Ban the internet.

    I thought by now the WT would end this prophecy nonsense

    therevealer posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:45:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 826 of 1086
    Joined 10/25/2010

    More new watchtower language. Instead of new light, the light getting brighter, etc., we now find "This explanation updates the information discussed" in whatever publication the previous bullshite was in. The problem is that, truth be told, that former information had updated info that was former to it which info had updated, and on and on ad nauseam.

    breakfast of champions posted Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:30:00 GMT(3/18/2012)

    Post 1271 of 3667
    Joined 5/30/2011

    Wow. They just keep digging and digging. . . What nonsense.

      Close

      Confirm ...