Ted Jaracz is not one of Christ’s Brothers – Special Day Assembly Report

Hi Zarco. (and by the way, its Ted Jaracz)

Don't feel bad, Jaracz didn't even do a single lecture for our Gilead class. He farmed them out to Geoff Jackson. He coudn't be bothered. If he didn't say hi to you, he didn't say hi to (what I learned later) to several Gilead classes, ours included.

I can't wait till he dies. Just because he has caused so much misery.

Ted said that woman in a physically abusive marriage should submit to her husband so that eventually her husbands may respond to their submission and come to worship god.

Of course this is official WT teaching.

***

1 Cor. 7:10-16: "To the married people I give instructions, yet not I but the Lord, that a wife should not depart from her husband; but if she should actually depart, let her remain unmarried or else make up again with her husband; and a husband should not leave his wife. But to the others I say, yes, I, not the Lord [but, as verse 40 shows, Paul was directed by holy spirit]: If any brother has an unbelieving wife, and yet she is agreeable to dwelling with him, let him not leave her; and a woman who has an unbelieving husband, and yet he is agreeable to dwelling with her, let her not leave her husband. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified in relation to his wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified in relation to the brother; otherwise, your children would really be unclean, but now they are holy. But if the unbelieving one proceeds to depart, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not in servitude under such circumstances, but God has called you to peace. For, wife, how do you know but that you will save your husband? Or, husband, how do you know but that you will save your wife?" (Why would the believer put up with hardship and earnestly endeavor to hold the marriage together? Out of respect for the divine origin of marriage and in hope that the unbeliever may in time be helped to become a servant of the true God.)

***

A convulsive idiot forlorn and delusional on reality.

Well folks this what happens when people think its better to follow the social morals of 2000 year old ancient Israelites.

Submit to Ted folks he's well educated in modern human sociality.  

Ok I have to find another way to post out of WTLIB 2007. Sorry about the formatting. It just proves that one version of WT teaching in this area is to "grin and bear it" in hope the "unbeliever" will come around.

Isaac

Ok I have to find another way to post out of WTLIB 2007. Sorry about the formatting.

Do you have Word? Try importing it their first.

From experiance, letting a man  continue to beat the hell out of you does not rehabilitate them, bring them closer to God or make them sorry for doing it.

They will not be won over without a word or any of that other BS they put out.

They will beat the shit out of you and you will like it or get the hell away.

If any woman here is abused, get out of that situation and quickly.

If you need help, PM me.

purps

DiId he say what to do in the case of a jw husband who is beaten by his unbelieving wife? Should the husband submit to his wife so she can learn the truth? Or do the men get to hit back?

Just curious

loosie ( of the too much of a feminist to be a jw class)

From experiance, letting a man  continue to beat the hell out of you does not rehabilitate them, bring them closer to God or make them sorry for doing it. They will not be won over without a word or any of that other BS they put out. They will beat the shit out of you and you will like it or get the hell away. If any woman here is abused, get out of that situation and quickly.

AMEN!

This goes to show what kind of lack of respect that woman or wifes have in the Jehovah Witness world, I wonder of this holds true also to any slaves

that men have or perhaps children.

Religion is about power folks its not about love and respect.

Didn't the bible also say spare the rod and spoil the child ?

It's been a long time since I was a JW but I thought physical abuse was one of the circumstances that allowed a woman to leave her husband.  That wasn't enough to justify a divorce, but did allow for not living together.  Am I remembering wrong?  Isn't it the same policy as for someone whose spouse is sharing apostate information with them and therefore "spiritually endangering" them? 

You say this was a recent speech? how recent? getting a clip of jackass saying that on youtube would be helpful!

Whilst I don't doubt that such stupid things are said, quotations like these must be backed up with at least date and locaction. Ideally as Carla says a clip would be even better.

This is the fool who said that child rape and abuse were covered by privacy laws.

"You asked me a question and it should have been answered to your satisfaction.

HB

Ted said that woman in a physically abusive marriage should submit to her husband so that eventually her husbands may respond to their submission and come to worship god. My family was completely shocked.

I'm not.  Nothing that idiot says surprises me anymore.  Plus, you have to remember that idiots like Ted Jackass Jaracz are still 50 years behind the times.  He views women as second class citizens and would like to see them all kept barefoot and pregnant.  Idiot.