Viewed 6768 times
JW membership turnover - a real-life study
besty
|
JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 05:04:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
|---|---|
![]() CaliforniaPost 410 of 4566 Since 3/3/2005 |
Much has been commented here on how JW's rely on an ever-changing membership for keeping their 'the sky is falling, the world is ending' doctrine fresh. Recently it was posted that fully 2/3 of born-in JW's leave at some point, and I thought you might like to see how this works in practice. So lets take Sam and I and our extended families - we were both born and brought up JW's. Start with me. Mum and Dad were converted in the 1950's. Two children - my brother Andrew and I brought up as JW's. Dad has now passed on and Mum is early 70's. Andrew and his wife Emma remain JW's but have no children and being late 30's early 40's are a self-declared childless couple. So the JW line dies with them. Sam and I have 2 children and - yes -you've guessed - we are not JW and neither will our children be JW. Current active JW's 3 - average age 53 - future generations - 0. Lets take my wife Sam. Brought up a JW with one sister Gemma. Sam's Dad Gerry was a convert and her Mum Kathy and her sister Rosalind were brought up in a divided household. So Sam was a 3rd generation JW. Rosalind and her husband (Elder PO) split up and the resultant 2 children (Sam's 1st cousins) both left the JW's and Rosalind and ex-husband are effectively gone. Sams sister Gemma also left the JW's shortly after starting a university education. Current active JW's 2 - average age 63 - future generations - 0. Finally my sister in law Emma. I have counted Emma above so wion't include her in the figures below. She was also brought up a JW with one sister Lorna. Both parents still nominal JW's with the Mum bedridden with ME and active elder father. Lorna mentally ill but nominally active. Current active JW's - impossible to say but realistically 1 and 2 irregular/incapables - average age 55 - future generations - 0. So let me summarise: 1960's - approx. 11 active JW's 1970's - approx. 11 active JW's + 8 children 1980's - approx. 12 active JW's + 6 children 1990's - approx 10 active JW's 2000's - approx. 5 active JW's (and thats giving some of them the benefit of the doubt) with a big fat ZERO in the pipeline So you can see there was a golden age for my family in the '70's and 80's when 20 or so were bulking up the numbers - if it had been an attractive organisation that encouraged marriage and children there could have been 30 or 40 of us all at the meetings today. But that would be missing the point - the point is the WTS don't care who the individuals are - so long as the NUMBERS are there the faces don't matter. Thanks for reading. Its Friday night in LA, Saturday night in New Zealand and Saturday morning in London. Happy days.
|
sweet pea
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:02:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 460 of 1254 Since 4/10/2007 |
This is what happens when I go out for the evening.
Besty's ruminations over a JD and coke. Nice one honey. It gives me great satisfaction to know that at least out of 4 families of witnesses there will be no more witnesses in the future. There is hope after all. |
llbh
|
eyRe: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:09:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() England, HertfordshirePost 1899 of 4206 Since 9/29/2007 |
Hey i notice your Sam's avatar say's she is in the Uk and Paul's the US, so to here you guuys are no longer together - joke Hope you are having a good time David |
SirNose586
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:12:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 2815 of 3995 Since 7/6/2006 |
Thanks for sharing, besty. I also find the "not bearing kids this side of Ahm-a-gettin" couples intriguing; for all their zeal, who'll continue their line? What's there to pass on? And 40 years from now, when they're all 70-80, how're they gonna feel? |
Tired of the Hypocrisy
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:54:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 460 of 2031 Since 1/29/2008 |
Ok, it is now almost 2 AM in california and I have had about 3 hours of sleep in 56. But I can still follow your idea and I think it is pretty accurate. |
Mickey mouse
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:02:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() Post 158 of 4621 Since 12/11/2007 |
Ooohh interesting. Thanks. No one has left in my family. Many are remaining childless though. So sad.
![]() |
greendawn
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:28:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() EnglandPost 12387 of 12696 Since 4/9/2004 |
They do have a large turn over number, the problems come home to roost as members vote with their feet versus their foolish policies, stern authoritarianism in the democratic western world of the 21st century, never ending deception and manipulation, the inability to offer real solutions rather than constantly criticise, the excessive demands and lack of real support, the very harsh excommunication policy, the hopelessly muddled blood policy.
All in all it's an org that demands a great deal and offers basically nothing of value in return. |
The-Borg
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:10:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() EnglandPost 188 of 471 Since 8/22/2007 |
Hi Besty nice to hear from you, how are things going in sunny LA? Thanks for starting an intersting thread. Here is my own JW generation tree. Myself, I became a JW in the early nineties, no family are JW's and never will be. So I'll base this on my wife's Her parents became JW's in the late 60's brought up 6 children. Father active JW, passed away. Mother current active JW.
Out of her five sisters the eldest is a missionary, married mid 40's - unlikely to have kids. sister#2 - Married, both active JW's with 3 kids sister#3 - active JW, unmarried and likley to remain unmarried and childless (I blame the organisation for this sister#4 - My wife, married, one child due in 3 weeks!! Both active faders ;-). Our children will not be brought sister#5 - disfellowshipped no interest in JW's, baby on the way, doubt it will be brought up as JW, although may
|
|
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:47:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() Post 3507 of 14546 Since 5/10/2007 |
Well, they lost my support. They also lost any support that any children I would have borne had they allowed me the opportunity to attract the opposite sex would have given them, too. As I see it, that puts them down at least 4 or 5 potential members. And I hope I have a share in making that 500 or 1,000 members down. |
chickpea
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:18:00 GMT
(4/5/2008)
|
![]() Post 593 of 3878 Since 11/25/2007 |
very interesting breakdown.... makes it so realistic to understand the churn when applying that strategy to any given congregation...... we came in with 2 kids.... left with 4 and NONE of them will ever cross a KH threshold again |
besty
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:45:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 413 of 4566 Since 3/3/2005 |
Hi TheBorg - things are fine in LA thanks - just not enough sunshine LOL My main point with this turnover thing is that essentially it is unimportant to the WTS. So long as they can baptise 2-3% more than leave they will record another growth year. The actual composition of the flock is not relevant. Thats why its likely that 2/3rds of current JW's have been baptised in the last 10 years. |
crazyblondeb
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:11:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() MissouriPost 3452 of 5965 Since 4/29/2005 |
My family lineage: stepdad, 64 yrs.: DF x 1, will die a jw. mom, 64 yrs: DF x 1, will die a jw. Me (sis 1)43 yrs: DF'd x 2, left many years ago.........One child-NOT a JW Sis 2 40 yrs:..Left many years ago....2 children.NOT JW Sis 3- 33 yrs:..Left many years ago...2 children....NOT JW Sis 4- 32 yrs...Left many years ago....2 children...NOT JW Bro 30yrs.....Left many years ago.....still waiting for kids.... RESULT: NO MORE JW'S IN OUR FAMILY...........CYCLE IS BROKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
flipper
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:13:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 4186 of 17721 Since 3/7/2007 |
Besty & Sweet Pea - How are you folks ? Good thread ! According to the recent news reports on people being raised up in the JW religion - 66% of those raised in it leave. So of my 3 adult children son23, daughter 21, and another daughter 20 I figure if I get 2 of them out of the cult I can stay with the average. My oldest son is out already, and he and I are gradually working on my oldest daughter, so we shall see what happens in time ! So good you will not be raising your kids under mind control- count your lucky stars ! Peace out, Mr. Flipper |
Dogpatch
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:17:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 2014 of 4116 Since 12/26/2000 |
we hijacked them to Manhattan Beach! now they have to support Bush! :-)) Randy |
brunnhilde
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:30:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() WashingtonPost 368 of 418 Since 1/22/2007 |
It's an interesting that my cousin just commented this week that I was the last one of our generation to leave. Now my parents are in and hers, and that is it. None of our kids are in so when our folks are gone, that's it. brunn |
besty
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:31:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 414 of 4566 Since 3/3/2005 |
Best thing sice I came to Manhattan Beach was getting a cell phone with 666 in my number :-) LOL
|
besty
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:50:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 415 of 4566 Since 3/3/2005 |
Just to summarise: Out of 8 children in 'my' extended family generation born as JW's, 5 have seen the light and left. I make that near as dammit to the 2/3 figure quoted in the recent survey. The 3 that are JW are either unmarried or childless. In the words of crazyblondeb: RESULT: NO MORE JW'S IN OUR FAMILY...........CYCLE IS BROKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:43:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() Post 370 of 471 Since 7/20/2003 |
I was raised in the "truth", I have 3 daughters and 2 sons, when I left they did too. I can honestly say that we're all glad to be free. |
lisavegas420
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:44:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() OhioPost 2317 of 3761 Since 11/29/2002 |
My grandmother on my moms side had three children. Only one child remains a JW, my mom. My mom had 4 children, only one remains a JW, my sister. My one sister that remains a JW, had 4 children. One is no longer a JW...and by the MYSPACE's of her other three children, I'm guessing they will be gone within the next 10 yrs. The nonsense will stop at this generation. My kids know better than to join a cult. lisa |
Gayle
|
Re: JW membership turnover - a real-life study
posted Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:02:00 GMT
(4/6/2008)
|
![]() ArizonaPost 523 of 4112 Since 11/17/2006 |
My folks became JWs in the 50s, had 5 children, grew up, 4 of 5 pioneered & went also to Bethel. In time we married (4 of 5 married JWs and 1 married a non believer), altogether we have had 15 children. We all left JWdom. All 15 kids are all baggage-free of JWdom with some having only some memories of JW life when very young. We have still some extended family members JWs, 1 line into their 5th generation now.
|


Home

California


England, Hertfordshire















