Viewed 1765 times
no longer a JW annoucement
asilentone
|
no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:54:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
|---|---|
![]() Post 35 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
If they make announcement in the KH that person is no longer a JW, do they treat them as disfellowshipped? They made annoucement for my friend that is no longer a JW, his girflfriend invited me to go bowling. I told her that I cannot do that because since I am a fader and I do not want to get caught since I have JW family ties. His girlfriend has never been a JW, she emailed me that he is not disfellowshipped, but he is no longer a JW, Do I have to avoid them in public places because I do not want to lose family ties? I told them we can do things together, but not in a public place. I would like to know how to explain it to her. |
DaCheech
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:59:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
![]() Post 1484 of 7220 Since 5/13/2004 |
unbfortunately that is the case!
sorry, but you can take a stand or just see them privately |
daniel-p
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:00:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
![]() Post 1864 of 4716 Since 10/22/2005 |
Yes, the new phraseology for disfellowshiping announcements is "So-and-so is no longer one of Jehovah's WItnesses."
|
Open mind
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:22:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
![]() Uzbekistan Post 3141 of 6487 Since 8/30/2006 |
Do you know the exact wording of the announcement? Was it no longer a "publisher of the good news" or was it "one of Jehovah's Witnesses"? If the announcement was: "asilentone's friend is no longer a publisher of the good news." This announcement is for people who were publishers, but never got baptized. You can still go bowling without serious JW repercussions. Many JWs will look down their nose at you for seeking out "bad association" but that's about it. If the announcement was: "asilentone's friend is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses." You can't go bowling without risking getting DFed yourself. If the announcement was: "asilentone's friend has been accepted to Bethel." You can't go bowling because Bethelites won't hang out with lowlifes like you. OM |
asilentone
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:31:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
![]() Post 36 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
OM, he was baptized brother, he was raised in the "truth".
|
Open mind
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:41:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
![]() Uzbekistan Post 3143 of 6487 Since 8/30/2006 |
Well then, unless he's a close family member, bowling night is out. OM
|
AudeSapere
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:43:00 GMT
(4/7/2008)
|
![]() CaliforniaPost 2237 of 4398 Since 2/2/2006 |
Once baptized, if an announcement is made that 'no longer a jw' or 'has been df'd' - it's all the same treatment and consequences. You can't go bowling without risking getting DFed yourself. (Unless your friend also happens to be a close family member. Then, the Flock Book says the elders can look the other way if you're not really in their face about it.) This is the announcement made for baptized JWs who are either DFed or DA themselves. Are you sure they can't go bowling? What if they don't speak to each other and no food is served?? I don't think the bible specifically forbids bowling. -Aude. |
freetosee
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:01:00 GMT
(4/8/2008)
|
![]() Post 932 of 1393 Since 5/2/2006 |
Just a couple of years back, the wts wanted more privileges in Germany. The Berlin Senate criticised the the blood issue and the NO to voting. A responsible official told me that there will be changes on those issues. that was about half a year before it was in the wt. (So much to new light and FDS. A servant of Satan's beast knew about the "light" before any of the anointed I know did...) fts |
asilentone
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:01:00 GMT
(4/8/2008)
|
![]() Post 37 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
Thank you for all of your comments, if you have some more comments, bring it on!
|
|
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:06:00 GMT
(4/8/2008)
|
![]() Post 3557 of 14554 Since 5/10/2007 |
There is a way out of this dilemma. If you do your bowling out of town, Brother Hounder is going to have a much harder time finding you. The further out of town, the better. Of course, that also means higher costs in time and gas to get there.
|
sacolton
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:12:00 GMT
(4/8/2008)
|
![]() OklahomaPost 347 of 3835 Since 2/12/2008 |
I imagine the angels sing praises each time someone is announced they are "no longer a Jehovah's Witness".
|
|
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 05:16:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
|
Post 467 of 3295 Since 4/3/2009 |
asilentone, was you previously associated with an asl congo?
Scott77 |
asilentone
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 05:18:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
![]() Post 3980 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
yes, I was. (I was supposed to be asleep by now, but now I am addicted to JWN) |
|
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 05:19:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
|
Post 5968 of 7167 Since 7/30/2008 |
Since his GF was not a JW you could probably go out with her, but your friend would have to stay home so as not to blow your cover.
|
asilentone
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 05:20:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
![]() Post 3981 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
The thread is two year old. |
crazyblondeb
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 06:45:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
![]() MissouriPost 5602 of 5002 Since 4/29/2005 |
someone is way to bored, and has too much time on his hands...WTF? |
OnTheWayOut
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:41:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
![]() IllinoisPost 10746 of 17107 Since 9/8/2006 |
As long as the thread was dredged up, what happened? Did you ever go out in public with your friend? |
asilentone
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:33:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
![]() Post 3986 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
no, not yet, too risky at this time. |
asilentone
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:33:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
![]() Post 3987 of 6413 Since 3/25/2008 |
we still keep in touch via email. |
|
|
Re: no longer a JW annoucement
posted Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:39:00 GMT
(4/3/2010)
|
|
Post 475 of 3295 Since 4/3/2009 |
Thank you OTWO for asking. Good to know the updates. Crazyblondeb, are you upset with me??????????????
Scott77 |


Home














